Phylogeny & common ancestry
What you'll learn
About 7 min read- Read a cladogram to find the most recent common ancestor and the closest relatives.
- Build a cladogram from a character table or sequence differences.
- Distinguish homologous from analogous structures.
Lesson
For most of the 20th century, biologists split living things into two big groups: prokaryotes, with no nucleus, and eukaryotes, with one. Then in 1977, Carl Woese and George Fox compared the sequences of ribosomal RNA, a molecule every cell uses to build proteins, across many microbes. Some of them, including the methane-making microbes called methanogens, looked like ordinary bacteria under a microscope, but their RNA put them on a line of descent as distinct from bacteria as it was from eukaryotes. Woese argued they were a separate line of life, later named the Archaea. Many leading biologists thought he was wrong, and for a while he had a reputation as a crank. But the evidence kept piling up, and by the mid-1980s the Archaea were accepted. In 1990 Woese and his colleagues proposed the three domains of life used today: Bacteria, Archaea and Eukarya. Appearance had hidden one of the deepest branches on the tree of life.
Evidence that all life shares an ancestor
Every living cell stores its genes in DNA, uses almost the same genetic code to read them, builds proteins on ribosomes and breaks down glucose by glycolysis. There's no reason all life would have to work this way, so the simplest explanation is that all of it inherited these features from one ancient ancestor, often called LUCA, the last universal common ancestor.
Bodies carry evidence too. A human arm, a whale's flipper, a bat's wing and a cat's leg do very different jobs, yet they're built from the same set of bones in the same arrangement. Features that are similar because they were inherited from a common ancestor are called homologous structures. Some homologous structures are vestigial: reduced remnants with little or no function, like the small leg bones buried inside the bodies of some whales.
Reading a phylogenetic tree
A phylogenetic tree is a diagram of how groups of organisms are thought to be related. It's a hypothesis, based on the best evidence available, and it can change as new evidence comes in. A tree drawn from shared characters, often without meaningful branch lengths, is called a cladogram.
- The root is the common ancestor of everything on the tree.
- Each node (branch point) is a common ancestor that split into two lineages. Speciation events are the nodes.
- The tips are the groups being compared, usually living species.
- Two lineages that come from the same node are sister taxa: each is the other's closest relative on the tree.
To find the most recent common ancestor of two species, trace each of their branches back towards the root until they meet. The node where they join is their most recent common ancestor. The more recent that node (the closer it is to the tips), the more closely related the two species are.
Homology versus analogy
Looking alike isn't the same as being related. Analogous structures are similar because they do the same job, not because they were inherited from a common ancestor. They're the result of convergent evolution: unrelated lineages facing similar challenges and evolving similar solutions. Sharks and dolphins both have streamlined bodies and fins, but a shark is a fish and a dolphin is a mammal whose ancestors lived on land.
A good rule is that the more complex and detailed a similarity is, the more likely it reflects common ancestry. A simple streamlined shape is easy to evolve twice; an identical arrangement of dozens of bones is not.
Building a cladogram
Not every shared feature helps. A shared ancestral character is one inherited from an ancestor further back, so it's shared by everything in the group and can't separate them. A backbone is shared by all vertebrates, so it can't tell you whether a lizard is closer to a frog or a mouse. A shared derived character is a newer feature that only some members have. The amniotic egg is shared by reptiles, birds and mammals but not frogs, so it marks those groups as one branch.
Whether a character is ancestral or derived depends on which part of the tree you're looking at. To decide, you use an outgroup: a species known to have branched off before all the others. Anything the outgroup has is probably ancestral.
- Make a table of which species have which characters. Include an outgroup.
- Find the character shared by the most species (apart from the outgroup). It marks the first branch point.
- Put the species with that character on one side of the node and those without it on the other.
- Repeat with the next most widely shared character, nesting groups inside groups.
- If the characters conflict, choose the tree that needs the fewest changes. This is the principle of maximum parsimony.
Every branch of a good tree forms a clade, or monophyletic group: an ancestor and all of its descendants. A group that includes an ancestor but leaves out some of its descendants is paraphyletic. The traditional "reptiles" are paraphyletic, because birds evolved from within the reptile branch but are left out of the group.
Molecular evidence
Today most trees are built from DNA, RNA or protein sequences. The logic is the same: species that share a more recent ancestor have had less time to build up differences, so their sequences are more alike. Molecular data can reveal relationships that bodies hide, as Woese's ribosomal RNA did. It works best combined with anatomical evidence, since sequences can also match by chance.
If a gene collects mutations at a fairly steady rate, the number of differences can estimate how long ago two lineages split. This is a molecular clock. It has to be calibrated with dated fossils, and the rate can differ between genes and lineages, so its dates come with error bars.
Worked example
A cladogram from a character table
Build a cladogram for the lamprey, tuna, frog, lizard and mouse using four characters: jaws, four limbs, amniotic egg and hair. The lamprey (the outgroup) has none of them. The tuna has jaws only. The frog has jaws and four limbs. The lizard has jaws, four limbs and an amniotic egg. The mouse has all four. Which animal is the lizard's closest relative here?
- The lamprey is the outgroup, so it branches off first. Lacking all four characters is the ancestral state.
- Jaws are shared by the most species (tuna, frog, lizard, mouse). Put a node for "jaws" that separates these four from the lamprey.
- Four limbs are shared by frog, lizard and mouse. The tuna branches off before this node.
- The amniotic egg is shared by lizard and mouse. The frog branches off before this node.
- Hair is found only in the mouse, so it marks the mouse's own branch. It doesn't group it with anything.
- The lizard and mouse come from the same node (the amniotic egg), so they are sister taxa.
Answer: Order of branching: lamprey, then tuna, then frog, then lizard and mouse as sister taxa. The lizard's closest relative in this set is the mouse, not the frog, even though a lizard might look more like a frog than a mouse.
Key terms
- Phylogenetic tree / cladogram
- A diagram of hypothesised evolutionary relationships / one built from shared derived characters.
- Node
- A branch point on a tree, representing a common ancestor that split into two lineages.
- Sister taxa
- Two lineages that come from the same node; each other's closest relatives on the tree.
- Homologous / analogous structures
- Similar because inherited from a common ancestor / similar because of convergent evolution.
- Shared derived character
- A newer feature found in some members of a group, used to define a branch.
- Outgroup
- A species that branched off before the group being studied, used to tell ancestral from derived characters.
- Monophyletic / paraphyletic group
- An ancestor and all its descendants / an ancestor and only some of its descendants.
- Maximum parsimony
- Choosing the tree that requires the fewest evolutionary changes.
- Molecular clock
- Using the number of sequence differences, calibrated with fossils, to estimate when lineages split.
Check yourself
Try answering in your head before you open each answer.
1.On a tree, crocodiles and birds share a node that lizards branched off before. A friend says, "That can't be right: crocodiles look like lizards, not birds." How would you answer?Show answerHide
Relatedness depends on how recently species share a common ancestor, not on how alike they look. Crocodiles and birds share a more recent ancestor than either does with lizards. Birds changed a great deal after that split, while crocodiles kept more of the ancestral body shape. Their shared derived characters and DNA sequences, not overall appearance, support the grouping.
2.Three species are compared at a 100-base stretch of DNA. A and B differ at 3 positions, A and C at 12, and B and C at 11. Which two are sister taxa, and why?Show answerHide
A and B. They have the fewest differences, so they are most likely to share the most recent common ancestor. C branched off earlier, which is why it's roughly equally different from both.
3.Penguins' flippers and seals' flippers are both used for swimming. Are they homologous or analogous? Is there any sense in which they're homologous?Show answerHide
As flippers, they're analogous: penguins and seals evolved swimming limbs separately, from a flying bird ancestor and a walking mammal ancestor. But as forelimbs, they're homologous, because both are built from the same arm bones inherited from a four-limbed ancestor.
Misconception alerts
Misconception“Species at the right-hand tips are more advanced, and humans evolved from chimpanzees.”Why is this wrong? Think first, then open.
Why it's tempting
Trees drawn with humans at the end look like a ladder of progress.
What's actually true
All living species are equally recent tips. Humans and chimpanzees share a common ancestor that lived about 6–7 million years ago, and rotating branches around a node doesn't change the tree.
Misconception“Organisms that look alike are closely related.”Why is this wrong? Think first, then open.
Why it's tempting
Classification historically relied on appearance.
What's actually true
Convergent evolution produces similar forms in distant lineages: bat and bird wings, shark and dolphin body shapes. Relatedness is judged from shared derived characters and sequences.
Olympiad depth
Parsimony and molecular clocks; homology vs. analogy; monophyletic vs. paraphyletic groups and the role of outgroups. Also covered: the three domains and LUCA, and horizontal gene transfer, which complicates trees.
Concept links
- Builds onNatural selectionDescent with modification.
- Builds onNucleic acidsDNA sequence comparisons provide the main evidence.
- Applies toOrganelles & compartmentalisationOrganelle genomes trace mitochondria and chloroplasts to bacterial ancestors.
Linked from
Test yourself
Cytochrome c and the dolphin
Which conclusion do these data best support?
Start the drillStill stuck?
See what other students have asked about this topic, or ask your own question.